How come you don’t see many of this style tested barlow?

Dgood187 · Post by **Dgood187** » Wed Aug 09, 2023 3:29 pm

Dgood187 · Post by **Dgood187** » Wed Aug 09, 2023 3:46 pm

62005 1/2?

Dgood187 · Post by **Dgood187** » Wed Aug 09, 2023 3:46 pm

62005 1/2?

Mumbleypeg · Post by **Mumbleypeg** » Wed Aug 09, 2023 7:01 pm

I don’t think they made any with that stamp on the bolster. I’m no Barlow expert so I could be wrong, but I don’t recall seeing one like that other than fakes, and don’t find any like it on knifedb.com either. The only similar pre-XX 62005-1/2 on knifedb.com is a Case Bradford tang stamp, flat-sided bolster with greenbone covers. The stamp on the bolster has no long tail C, just CASE’s TESTED XX.

Hope I’m wrong.

Ken

Edit: a little research here found this, so it could be a legit knife. viewtopic.php?p=643730&hilit=62005#p643730

btrwtr · Post by **btrwtr** » Wed Aug 09, 2023 8:08 pm

I believe that pattern was discontinued very early in the Tested years. I owned one many years back. Don't see many. 62005 1/2

All About Pocket Knives

How come you don’t see many of this style tested barlow?

How come you don’t see many of this style tested barlow?

Re: How come you don’t see many of this style tested barlow?

Re: How come you don’t see many of this style tested barlow?

Re: How come you don’t see many of this style tested barlow?

Re: How come you don’t see many of this style tested barlow?