#6392 stockman with stag handles and no oval around case?

brownbag · Post by **brownbag** » Sat May 27, 2006 1:43 pm

I can't find this knife in my books? can you give me any info? thanks-doug

yerout · Post by **yerout** » Sat May 27, 2006 10:39 pm

Brownbag, a 6392 big stockman would not have Stag Handles instead the handle material would be dyed Bone, a pic of the tang stamp on the master blade would help a lot as far as what era it was made, post another pic or two maybe we can help more.

Hope this helps
Roger

Blade Runner · Post by **Blade Runner** » Mon May 29, 2006 4:29 am

Based just on the info you give, I would check the saw marks and pin work real good on the handle material. There are a couple of red flags here. How about better pictures so we can better evaluate this knife!
Take Care
Blade Runner

brownbag · Post by **brownbag** » Mon May 29, 2006 10:56 pm

Thanks, The handles look like stag-no saw marks or pic marks. That is what throws me with the tag and all the info saying it should be bone. the shield has no oval. See if this second picture helps. thanks again ,brownbag

yerout · Post by **yerout** » Tue May 30, 2006 1:15 am

Looks like its been rehandled, but would like to see a pic of the other side of the master blade, so we can see the tang stamp.

Thanks
Roger

brownbag · Post by **brownbag** » Tue May 30, 2006 2:16 pm

I've had this knife for approx. 20 years and it was not a traded knife. I just figure that Case was in a transition period and they just had a lillle stag and stuck it on the knife? brownbag

brownbag · Post by **brownbag** » Tue May 30, 2006 9:54 pm

I'm going to get the knife back out and take a bunch of pictures to post. The knife has never been used and is in mint condition, but the tang says bone and the handles are plainly stag??? brownbag

Blade Runner · Post by **Blade Runner** » Wed May 31, 2006 1:52 am

If possible give us some good close up shots of where the stag meets the bolsters(saw marks), the routing around the shield, the handle pins, and bolster pins. The shield you speak of is not the norm for Case knives with stag handles, it was used on synthetic and wood handled knives. Also the only occassion I know of that the number "6" was used on stag was on the wine colored second cut stag in the Case XX U.S.A. era (c-1965-1969). Blade Runner

brownbag · Post by **brownbag** » Wed May 31, 2006 1:57 pm

here are some pictures- appreciate any insite. thanks, brownbag

brownbag · Post by **brownbag** » Wed May 31, 2006 2:00 pm

another view

brownbag · Post by **brownbag** » Wed May 31, 2006 2:03 pm

another view

brownbag · Post by **brownbag** » Wed May 31, 2006 2:05 pm

top view

brownbag · Post by **brownbag** » Wed May 31, 2006 2:07 pm

another

brownbag · Post by **brownbag** » Wed May 31, 2006 2:11 pm

last picture-I'm almost positive I bought this knife at Princeton, Ky. around 1975? It has been in my file cabinet for a long time. Thanks for any info you can give me. doug

Blade Runner · Post by **Blade Runner** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:05 am

Hi Brown Bag
Whether it was done years ago or yesterday this knife IMHO has been monkyed with ie, rehandled, wrong shield. The pictures are not too clear but the pins don't even look spun to me and the stag don't look like Case Stag . On top of that the hafting is not right either. I could go on but I think I've made my point.
Take Care
Blade Runner

Bryan · Post by **Bryan** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:40 am

For what it's worth, I agree with Blade Runner 110%.

Looks to me like this started out as a delrin handled knife and was rehandled at some point with genuine stag scales.

Bryan

brownbag · Post by **brownbag** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 3:19 am

I have to agree with you it doesn't look right. If it was monkeyed with it had to be years ago and before I got it and for the life of me I can't tell you for sure where it came from. Back then I was not aware of any real reason to mess with a knife like this but there may have been. I really don't know but I appreciate all your help. doug ps- maybe someone at Case was having a bad day??

knifeaholic · Post by **knifeaholic** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 7:31 pm

Terrible rehandle job on a delrin 6392. Looks nothing like an authentic Case stag handle job. It was reltively common in the 70's, no collectors wanted delrin knives so many were rehandled in stag usally restamped CASE XX.

brownbag · Post by **brownbag** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 7:46 pm

very interesting. can you give me a name of someone who rehandled these knives? I would enjoy talking to them. It was an indivual and not Case? thanks dgh

knifeaholic · Post by **knifeaholic** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 7:55 pm

brownbag wrote:very interesting. can you give me a name of someone who rehandled these knives? I would enjoy talking to them. It was an indivual and not Case? thanks dgh

Why would Case rehandle their own knives?

And sure...I remember names and phone numbers from 30 years ago, and it would be no problem for me to give them to you so you could call these people out of the blue.

Sorry for the sarcasm, but this type of thing was usually done anonymously by counterfeiters trying to pass the knives off as valuable Case stags. Occasionally it was done by amateur knife tinkerers just to make thier own carry knife a little nicer.

brownbag · Post by **brownbag** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:25 pm

Thanks for the information and the gracious reply. It is always an honor to converse with a gentleman with superior knowledge. Knife people are just good folks. dgh

All About Pocket Knives

#6392 stockman with stag handles and no oval around case?

#6392 stockman with stag handles and no oval around case?

6392 stag