Well, when I see Delrin on a Camillus I know that those handles were not used before the early 1970s, but with this knife I don’t have a clue.
Someone has gone to great a length to try and make it look like they have spun the pins in the handles, but it does not have spun pins.
The pins look like someone has peaned them and then used a nail set on the pins to give the impression that the pins were spun in place on the handles. If they did use a spinner they did not get good results because the heads are not smooth.
Camillus actually used “semi tubular rivets” on most of the handles. Look at other Camillus knives you have with Delrin handles; the handle pins do not have the circular marks around them and they are not an irregular shape like these are. When you see those spinner marks on a Camillus they are normally seen only on the rocker pin; the pin in the center that holds the springs in place.
The knife has been modified. Who knows which parts have been replaced, besides the rivets? The rivets are obviously not original because they are peaned. If they were properly spun in place they would have smooth heads on them, not the peaned ends on those pins. Look at the pins on the mark side of the knife. They may have had a spinner on them after the fact, but those are not properly spun heads. They appear to have been peaned then someone tried to spin them after the fact.
Besides buffing the knife, I would say someone has changed the handles and perhaps a blade as well. Going by Goins’ book, the tang stamp is 1976 or later, but I don’t know which parts ore original to the knife.
For the record, I have never seen this done to a Camillus before, at least not to then have it sold as an original Camillus knife.
