MILLER BRO`S wrote: Dale, considering the condition of your knife from the start, there is nothing wrong with what you are doing to it. However, if it were a one of a kind knife and there were no other known examples then that would be a different story.
I totally agree if the examples are rare or one-of-a-kind………..DON’T TOUCH THEM!
MILLER BRO`S wrote: In fact from the prices I see on the internet, the buyers like them all polished up. This knife would bring LESS money because of the coating on the surfaces. That’s what happens when collectors forget about the history of knives and just go for finding Rare or "Mint" examples.
I totally agree. I am posting a pic of a nice old Ulster Jack.
From the pitting on the blade, it had been in the presence of a knife with off-gassing celluloid. Notice the lines of pitting on the blades where they sit inside the liners.
Someone buffed the snot out of this knife to sell it on ebay and did not post pics that really showed the damage to the blades. The handles have been buffed so much that you can barely make out the advertising on them. Front handle says O. S. JOYCE. The back handle says; TRI-POINT OIL CO. / CHAMPION OILS.
I really would rather have gotten it in the original condition. This is an excellent example of the seller thinking he would get a lot more money if it were polished. If he paid someone to do the polishing for him, he probably lost money as the knife only sold for $27.00. I would have paid more if it had the patina.
Aimus Moses wrote:
My question is would a person that has some unused Case or Schrade knives with carbon steel blades cause any value damage, short or long term, to the knives by taking some polish & an old t-shirt and rubbing the blades to get the darker tint off the blades that are common to carbon steel blades from the effects of time, & knocking the dull look off the bolsters? Are the blades and bolsters better left alone with the dark tinted blades and dull looking bolsters to keep more of the value of the knives? I guess what I'm asking is should a knife be left in the exact condition you received it in for it to retain it's true value?
IMHO, and it is just MY opinion, I think active rust MUST be stopped, otherwise it is a cancer that will eat through the knife.
If nickel silver bolsters have the red haze on them that is indicative of having been too close to off-gassing celluloid, I will clean it off to stop that damage. I think what you are seeing is copper sulfide caused by the gaseous nitric acid released from the decomposing celluloid, leaching the copper out of the nickel silver. I think my chemistry is correct, but perhaps someone with a better chemistry background can correct me.
However, I will clean that reddish deposit off the nickel silver. I do not think it is necessary to polish the bolsters just for the sake of making them shiny.
As for the blades, if there is no active rust, I will wipe them down with a light oil and leave them alone otherwise.
The patina that develops on carbon steel knives actually protects them from rust. If you remove it, you make the blades more vulnerable to moisture.
When a knife has celluloid handles that have begun to off-gas I don’t think a collector has any choice but to remove the celluloid to stop the damage. Otherwise the knife will probably be totally destroyed eventually.
I would love to hear what the rest of you think about this.
This is an excellent discussion. I would like to hear more opinions.
Dale