Henry Sears 1895 fake or a mistake?

A place to discuss & share pictures of anything that relates to knives.
Post Reply
Clark23
Posts: 562
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:30 pm

Henry Sears 1895 fake or a mistake?

Post by Clark23 »

Just ran across this on the bay and didn’t even think the stamp was suppose to read 1865 and not 1895. I don’t have much in it thank goodness but I am curious is it’s a mistake made by Henry Sears or did someone go out the way to fake a stamp? The knife is as of an old Utica Cattle and I know Utica worked for Henry Sears so I like to get some feedback on this matter thank you in advance!
Attachments
IMG_8126.png
IMG_8127.png
IMG_8129.png
IMG_8128.png
IMG_8123.png
IMG_8124.png
IMG_8125.png
User avatar
New_Windsor_NY
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 14043
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 4:50 pm
Location: I'm On The Far Right On The Left Coast In Commiefornia

Re: Henry Sears 1895 fake or a mistake?

Post by New_Windsor_NY »

Clark23 wrote: Sun Aug 11, 2024 8:13 pm Just.....
Maybe an answer here? ::shrug::
viewtopic.php?t=54315
Kid: "Wish we had time to bury them fellas."
Josey Wales: "To hell with them fellas. Buzzards got to eat, same as worms."
Clint Eastwood-The Outlaw Josey Wales

Skip
Clark23
Posts: 562
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:30 pm

Re: Henry Sears 1895 fake or a mistake?

Post by Clark23 »

New_Windsor_NY wrote: Sun Aug 11, 2024 9:15 pm
Clark23 wrote: Sun Aug 11, 2024 8:13 pm Just.....
Maybe an answer here? ::shrug::
viewtopic.php?t=54315
Thanks for sharing, I seen that and taking what I have seen and read is a mistake made by the author?
User avatar
New_Windsor_NY
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 14043
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 4:50 pm
Location: I'm On The Far Right On The Left Coast In Commiefornia

Re: Henry Sears 1895 fake or a mistake?

Post by New_Windsor_NY »

Clark23 wrote: Sun Aug 11, 2024 9:25 pm Thanks.....
That was the WRONG link I posted.
Try the link now.
viewtopic.php?t=54315
Kid: "Wish we had time to bury them fellas."
Josey Wales: "To hell with them fellas. Buzzards got to eat, same as worms."
Clint Eastwood-The Outlaw Josey Wales

Skip
Clark23
Posts: 562
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:30 pm

Re: Henry Sears 1895 fake or a mistake?

Post by Clark23 »

New_Windsor_NY wrote: Sun Aug 11, 2024 9:35 pm
Clark23 wrote: Sun Aug 11, 2024 9:25 pm Thanks.....
That was the WRONG link I posted.
Try the link now.
viewtopic.php?t=54315
Thanks again, not seeing anything on the matter of a 1895 stamp?
User avatar
1967redrider
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 21499
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:23 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA
Contact:

Re: Henry Sears 1895 fake or a mistake?

Post by 1967redrider »

::hmm:: Interesting that it doesn't say 1865. ::shrug::
Pocket, fixed, machete, axe, it's all good!

You're going to look awfully silly with that knife sticking out of your @#$. -Clint Eastwood, High Plains Drifter


CHRIST IS KING
Reverand
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 4471
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2018 6:45 pm
Location: Pisgah, AL
Contact:

Re: Henry Sears 1895 fake or a mistake?

Post by Reverand »

I may be wrong, but the tang looks to have been shaved down, and the stamp looks cold-stamped, in my opinion.

I have doctored one of your photos to show what I mean. I drew a red line across the top of the tang. It should be straight across, but instead sweeps up near the spine. That is usually from someone grinding the name off of the tang.

Then in blue I point out the "mounding" effect of cold-stamping. Since the blade steel has already been tempered the stamp deforms the metal around it.

Also it appears that there is a "dip" in the surface of the mark-side bolster. Probably from sanding it down after re-working the knife.

None of this is absolute proof that the knife is a fake, but...
"Once is bad luck, twice is a coincidence, and three times is a conspiracy."
Attachments
IMG_3478.jpeg
Jesus is life.
Everything else is just a hobby.

~Reverand
ea42
Posts: 3194
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Wallkill, NY

Re: Henry Sears 1895 fake or a mistake?

Post by ea42 »

I don't think that's a "cold stamp". I've seen at least three other knives with that same 1895 stamp. Here's a shot of one. It's pretty blurry but it was definitely the 1895 stamp. This one was a stockman with black plastic handles and also made by Utica.
Henry Sears 1895.jpg
Eric
Clark23
Posts: 562
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:30 pm

Re: Henry Sears 1895 fake or a mistake?

Post by Clark23 »

ea42 wrote: Sat Aug 17, 2024 4:37 pm I don't think that's a "cold stamp". I've seen at least three other knives with that same 1895 stamp. Here's a shot of one. It's pretty blurry but it was definitely the 1895 stamp. This one was a stockman with black plastic handles and also made by Utica.

Henry Sears 1895.jpg

Eric
That is way awesome and definitely appreciate you for sharing this very much so. This is what I had another send me but doesn’t show all pictures but states it’s a 1895 stag just like mine noted just with slanted bolsters.

https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/ ... -1895-stag
Post Reply

Return to “General Knife Discussion”