
Does anyone know if this is a legit factory handle? It doesn't appear to have been tampered with.
Tang Stamp:
WESTERN
BOULDER, COLO.
PAT NO 1,967,479
I appreciate any information you could share with me about it.
Thank you.
Absolutely! It may not be shiny, but it will give someone a lifetime of use as a quality hunting knife that will hold a great edge!zzyzzogeton wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2023 2:41 pm The blade may be rough but it still has many years of prcatical use.
I have what I believe is a xWW 66 that appears in the TKMWWW catalog pages for the year 1941.The construction of my knife is similar to your knife .Red and black carbon spacers ,a couple brass spacers , aluminum guard and pommel.The two knifes do differ in one way .My knife has solid wood and your knife has two sections of wood split with spacers .I do think your knife has not been tampered with and came from the factory as is and for some reason your version was left out of the catalog print as an option .I don’t think Harvey Platts had the knife collectors interest for information in mind when the book was published.It was more of just a family tree with the factory specific information that was included in the printing .orvet wrote: ↑Sun Mar 19, 2023 4:43 amI found this old Western at a show sometime ago. It appears to be a W66, but I cannot find one in Harvey Platts book with a wooden handle that has spacers in the middle like this one. There is one listed with a solid Pakkawood handle and spacers on the end on page 163 of Harvey Platts book. It is in the 1959 - 1960 catalog reprint section.
Does anyone know if this is a legit factory handle? It doesn't appear to have been tampered with.
Tang Stamp:
WESTERN
BOULDER, COLO.
PAT NO 1,967,479
20230318_212655.jpg
20230318_212643.jpg
I appreciate any information you could share with me about it.
Thank you.
Thank you for your reply.The wood grain does look a bit odd to me when compared to the black and white colored catalog page . If the knife has been re handled after leaving the factory some one done a fantastic job ! Great save for an old knife 80 + years old .Here is a picture of the mark side sitting in what I believe may be the original sheath .The stain is a little darker on the pile side .Ridgegrass wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 1:41 pm Both nice Westerns. I would suggest that neither wood looks at all like cocobolo. I don't know what it is, Thomasg's looks a bit like cherry. ?? JMHO O'.
Thanks for your response.As always the information you have provided me with is a great asset to me as I pursue my hobby .The Olcult you provided for comparison is a fantastic knife ! It make me wonder if the coco was used by companies as an alternative to elbony that was so popular years ago .I have a Remington folder from early 30s with red wood handles that were stained black that I think were to stimulate an elbony look .Ridgegrass wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 3:58 am Tom: Those black and white ads don't show wood very well. I just thought the wood in both those knives didn't look like any coco I'd seen. If those knives are 1940's vintage maybe Western couldn't get coco due to restrictions on Brazilian imports and substituted some other wood ?? Who knows? For what it's worth here's a coco handled Olcut hunter and an Ulster folder I re-handled in wild cherry. The coco is darker, denser, with a much tighter grain, very much like rosewood. I think the handles on both knives in the original posts look "factory". Not saying yours is cherry, just looks more like a similar wood. It's just nice to know about things. For me it's the fun of the hobby. Good luck with your knife.J.O'.