1905 Bayonet Questions =)

A place to discuss & share pictures of anything that relates to knives.
Post Reply
papabear
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2024 5:07 am

1905 Bayonet Questions =)

Post by papabear »

Hello folks...
I got a new Bayonet. I am starting to understand some about it and wanted to get some opinions.. The knife seems to have been made by Oneida cutlery in 1942 and then cut down by Union Fork and Hoe. The bayonet has a serial number, or number of some sorts on the tang. I couldn't find much anywhere to figure out the significance of the meaning of the numbers.. let me know what you think.. Most appreciated!
Attachments
IMG_7503.jpeg
IMG_7504.jpeg
IMG_7494.jpeg
IMG_7493.jpeg
IMG_7492.jpeg
IMG_7491.jpeg
IMG_7490.jpeg
IMG_7489.jpeg
IMG_7488.jpeg
User avatar
New_Windsor_NY
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 14039
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 4:50 pm
Location: I'm On The Far Right On The Left Coast In Commiefornia

Re: 1905 Bayonet Questions =)

Post by New_Windsor_NY »

papabear wrote: Wed Dec 11, 2024 5:28 am Hello.....
You might want to check here:
viewforum.php?f=44
Kid: "Wish we had time to bury them fellas."
Josey Wales: "To hell with them fellas. Buzzards got to eat, same as worms."
Clint Eastwood-The Outlaw Josey Wales

Skip
98src
Posts: 331
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2018 12:35 pm

Re: 1905 Bayonet Questions =)

Post by 98src »

I think the original manufacturer was Utica Cutlery (UC).
papabear
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2024 5:07 am

Re: 1905 Bayonet Questions =)

Post by papabear »

thank you!
User avatar
GSPTOPDOG
Posts: 9133
Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2019 10:03 pm
Contact:

Re: 1905 Bayonet Questions =)

Post by GSPTOPDOG »

papabear wrote: Wed Dec 11, 2024 11:14 pmthank you!
Were they cut down by U.F.H. and reissued for use in Korea? Why would they have been altered in that way?
Please visit my AAPK store: https://www.allaboutpocketknives.com/ca ... er_id=2383

They say, “Hard work never hurt anyone”, but I'm still not willing to risk it.
papabear
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2024 5:07 am

Re: 1905 Bayonet Questions =)

Post by papabear »

From the tad of research I have read, it seems like the blade was made in 1942 by UC , then when the regulations changed for a smaller bayonet in 1943 they began to cut them down. I believe at that time they were making new 10" bayonets at the same time as modifying others to meet the new regulations.
User avatar
SwedgeHead
Posts: 602
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2023 12:23 am

Re: 1905 Bayonet Questions =)

Post by SwedgeHead »

Would an official cut-down preserve the original profile? Could just be too, a damaged edge someone ground down
User avatar
zzyzzogeton
Posts: 1840
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 8:47 pm
Location: In the Heart of Texas on the Blackland Prairie

Re: 1905 Bayonet Questions =)

Post by zzyzzogeton »

SwedgeHead wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2024 4:41 pm Would an official cut-down preserve the original profile? Could just be too, a damaged edge someone ground down
The cutdowns, designated M1905E1, were cut down starting in 1943 after the Army Ordnance Board decided that 10" blades were what was needed "now", as shown by the M1.

The 1942 M1905s were sent back to the same 5 manufacturers to be cut down, but were not necessarily sent back to the original manufacturer, as seen here, with Utica making it and Union Fork & Hoe cutting it down. Springfield and Rock Island M1905s from armories were sent to the same 5 companies. The ones cut down during the war by one of the manufacturers have the mark of the cutter down company.

The cutdowns were cut to various profiles. Some were cut to the original spear point profile, while others were cut to a clip point or drop point. Cutlers choice, as it were.

If an M1905E1 does not have a secondary stamp, it was -
1. cut down in the field during the war
2. broken and "fixed" - these blades are usually shorter than 10"

Rumors persist that some were shortened during the Korean War, but I have never seen a documented Korean War era shortened M1905E1. These rumors probably come from WW2 M1905E1s that were still in inventory at armories and issued at that time.
User avatar
SwedgeHead
Posts: 602
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2023 12:23 am

Re: 1905 Bayonet Questions =)

Post by SwedgeHead »

zzyzzogeton wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2024 8:00 pm
SwedgeHead wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2024 4:41 pm Would an official cut-down preserve the original profile? Could just be too, a damaged edge someone ground down
The cutdowns, designated M1905E1, were cut down starting in 1943 after the Army Ordnance Board decided that 10" blades were what was needed "now", as shown by the M1.

The 1942 M1905s were sent back to the same 5 manufacturers to be cut down, but were not necessarily sent back to the original manufacturer, as seen here, with Utica making it and Union Fork & Hoe cutting it down. Springfield and Rock Island M1905s from armories were sent to the same 5 companies. The ones cut down during the war by one of the manufacturers have the mark of the cutter down company.

The cutdowns were cut to various profiles. Some were cut to the original spear point profile, while others were cut to a clip point or drop point. Cutlers choice, as it were.

If an M1905E1 does not have a secondary stamp, it was -
1. cut down in the field during the war
2. broken and "fixed" - these blades are usually shorter than 10"

Rumors persist that some were shortened during the Korean War, but I have never seen a documented Korean War era shortened M1905E1. These rumors probably come from WW2 M1905E1s that were still in inventory at armories and issued at that time.
Well DANG, there you go - nicely done !
User avatar
GSPTOPDOG
Posts: 9133
Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2019 10:03 pm
Contact:

Re: 1905 Bayonet Questions =)

Post by GSPTOPDOG »

zzyzzogeton wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2024 8:00 pm
SwedgeHead wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2024 4:41 pm Would an official cut-down preserve the original profile? Could just be too, a damaged edge someone ground down
Rumors persist that some were shortened during the Korean War, but I have never seen a documented Korean War era shortened M1905E1. These rumors probably come from WW2 M1905E1s that were still in inventory at armories and issued at that time.
Excellent response ::handshake:: Thanks!
Please visit my AAPK store: https://www.allaboutpocketknives.com/ca ... er_id=2383

They say, “Hard work never hurt anyone”, but I'm still not willing to risk it.
papabear
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2024 5:07 am

Re: 1905 Bayonet Questions =)

Post by papabear »

thanks for all that info.. I think half the fun of having all these knives is finding out the details from others on what you have. Again thanks for the responses!
Post Reply

Return to “General Knife Discussion”