Page 1 of 1
A few questions about a fixed blade
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:29 pm
by Thomasg
First let me say the knife has been re handled with stag and had some file work in the back of the blade . The knife came with what appears to be a partial custom sheath . Knife total length 8 3/4 .Blade length 4 5/8. Questions 1 -can this knife be dated by the curved W.S. Tang stamp ? Question 2 - Is the nutted pommel original ? Question 3 - could the knife possibly be a knife body that was contracted from another knife company and been restored ?
Re: A few questions about a fixed blade
Posted: Mon May 13, 2024 11:51 pm
by Felanmac
Hello. I think there are others here with much more info, but, I believe it is a 1920s era Western Cut-Co skinner. Really neat old knife, has been re-handled. Hope
This helps!
Re: A few questions about a fixed blade
Posted: Wed May 15, 2024 1:36 am
by Thomasg
Felanmac wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 11:51 pm
Hello. I think there are others here with much more info, but, I believe it is a 1920s era Western Cut-Co skinner. Really neat old knife, has been re-handled. Hope
This helps!
Thank you for your response .I was thinking that frame and blade may have been an early contract knife made by k-bar or case . Much appreciated. The knife came from Washington state and who ever replaced the handle with stag and done the file work did a great job . Nice save on an old knife .
Re: A few questions about a fixed blade
Posted: Wed May 15, 2024 7:41 pm
by Felanmac
Happy to help out. It seems to be a Case SFO, which makes sense I think. Wasn’t Mr. Platts related to the Case family?
Re: A few questions about a fixed blade
Posted: Thu May 16, 2024 1:34 am
by Mumbleypeg
Felanmac wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2024 7:41 pm
Happy to help out. It seems to be a Case SFO, which makes sense I think. Wasn’t Mr. Platts related to the Case family?
I know nothing about the OP knife, but the Platts relationship with Case, Western, and other cutleries is fairly well documented here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Knife_Company. (One of few instances of Wikipedia being reasonably correct. Of course, being what it is, it could be edited with inaccuracies at any time.)
Ken