Page 1 of 1

Case G6265 SAB

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2018 5:45 pm
by SElliott
New to forum...got a buddy that asked me about this one. Understanding what it is, the "G" has me lost...any ideas on what the G stands for? ::shrug::
Screenshot_20180606-134758.jpg

Re: Case G6265 SAB

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2018 7:17 pm
by cody6268
G? To me, it looks more like a backwards and upside down 3, which may have been accidentally been done when the numbers were put in the stamping die.

Re: Case G6265 SAB

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2018 7:27 pm
by Steve Warden
Sorry, no idea.
But welcome to AAPK!

Re: Case G6265 SAB

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2018 7:28 pm
by SElliott
I'll get a better pic..

Re: Case G6265 SAB

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2018 9:40 pm
by zp4ja
SElliott wrote:New to forum...got a buddy that asked me about this one. Understanding what it is, the "G" has me lost...any ideas on what the G stands for? ::shrug:: Screenshot_20180606-134758.jpg
Welcome to the form.

Disfigured stamp or not, it is actually a "C" as in "Capped". Meaning there is a lower bolster on the knife opposite the end with the blades.

Think of it like this "C" prefix to model stamp or not...

Capped Jack has a lower bolster.

Barehead Jack has no lower bolster.

Other variations would be like this on say the CASE XX 31 pattern...

A CASE XX 6231 Capped Jack has a lower bolster.

A CASE XX 62031 Barehead Jack has no lower bolster.

Notice the zero in the middle of the handle/ # of blades and the pattern number? Indicates a change from original pattern. This knives have a zero or not to indicate capped or barehead.

This is not apples to apples since one is a 31 pattern (spear main) and one is a 31-1/2 pattern clip blade but it illustrates what I mean as far as capped versus barehead. Same frame, one capped and one barehead.

Jerry

Re: Case G6265 SAB

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2018 9:49 pm
by SElliott
Ahhhh..I knew SOMEONE would have an answer! Been creeping this forum for a long time for answers, and just now joined. Thanks for the quick reply! ::tu::

Re: Case G6265 SAB

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2018 11:49 pm
by knifeaholic
zp4ja wrote:
SElliott wrote:New to forum...got a buddy that asked me about this one. Understanding what it is, the "G" has me lost...any ideas on what the G stands for? ::shrug:: Screenshot_20180606-134758.jpg
Welcome to the form.

Disfigured stamp or not, it is actually a "C" as in "Capped". Meaning there is a lower bolster on the knife opposite the end with the blades.

Think of it like this "C" prefix to model stamp or not...

Capped Jack has a lower bolster.

Barehead Jack has no lower bolster.

Other variations would be like this on say the CASE XX 31 pattern...

A CASE XX 6231 Capped Jack has a lower bolster.

A CASE XX 62031 Barehead Jack has no lower bolster.

Notice the zero in the middle of the handle/ # of blades and the pattern number? Indicates a change from original pattern. This knives have a zero or not to indicate capped or barehead.

This is not apples to apples since one is a 31 pattern (spear main) and one is a 31-1/2 pattern clip blade but it illustrates what I mean as far as capped versus barehead. Same frame, one capped and one barehead.

Jerry
Nope...I have no idea why Case stamped the C ahead of the pattern number on that knife, but Case has never used the "C" designation on the 65 pattern folding hunter. They never would have a reason to since they never made the 65 as a "barehead". As far as I know the only Case pattern ever to actually use the "C" in the number was the C61050.

On that knife, whether its a C or a G, it is a mystery.

Re: Case G6265 SAB

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:33 am
by zp4ja
knifeaholic wrote:
zp4ja wrote:
SElliott wrote:New to forum...got a buddy that asked me about this one. Understanding what it is, the "G" has me lost...any ideas on what the G stands for? ::shrug:: Screenshot_20180606-134758.jpg
Welcome to the form.

Disfigured stamp or not, it is actually a "C" as in "Capped". Meaning there is a lower bolster on the knife opposite the end with the blades.

Think of it like this "C" prefix to model stamp or not...

Capped Jack has a lower bolster.

Barehead Jack has no lower bolster.

Other variations would be like this on say the CASE XX 31 pattern...

A CASE XX 6231 Capped Jack has a lower bolster.

A CASE XX 62031 Barehead Jack has no lower bolster.

Notice the zero in the middle of the handle/ # of blades and the pattern number? Indicates a change from original pattern. This knives have a zero or not to indicate capped or barehead.

This is not apples to apples since one is a 31 pattern (spear main) and one is a 31-1/2 pattern clip blade but it illustrates what I mean as far as capped versus barehead. Same frame, one capped and one barehead.

Jerry
Nope...I have no idea why Case stamped the C ahead of the pattern number on that knife, but Case has never used the "C" designation on the 65 pattern folding hunter. They never would have a reason to since they never made the 65 as a "barehead". As far as I know the only Case pattern ever to actually use the "C" in the number was the C61050.

On that knife, whether its a C or a G, it is a mystery.

How embarrassing. You of course Steve are correct. Unknown what I was thinking. Got the two patterns mixed up. Besides incorrect pattern that has nothing to do with OP unfortunately, I believe I am correct about other data.

Re: Case G6265 SAB

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:51 am
by SElliott
Well crap! Yet another mystery left unsolved...appreciate the education though, folks!...we'll keep fishin for the answer...anyone? ::groove::

Re: Case G6265 SAB

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 1:44 pm
by knifeaholic
Jerry; your post was great, very detailed and informative about "capped" vs "barehead". Generally Case used the "middle zero" pattern designation for most patterns offered both ways - for example 6231 (capped) vs 62031 (barehead).

The C61050 and C61050 SAB are the only Case patterns that I am aware of that used the "C" to designate "capped".

My guess is that they used the C since the 050 pattern already had a middle zero, and the 0050 with two zeros was already used to designate a different variation of the 050 pattern.

Re: Case G6265 SAB

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:09 am
by SElliott
Is this better?
Is this better?

Re: Case G6265 SAB

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 3:43 am
by TwoFlowersLuggage
That is clearly a different character from the two "6" imprints. It is either a "G" or it is a 6 from a different tool. It also looks too well aligned with the other numbers (same vertical/horizontal spacing and same depth) to have been put on separately. I don't know anything about the 65 pattern - that's just what I see in the picture.