A.G Russell 2011 Texas Ranger Knife
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:39 pm
I have been a fan of the A.G. Russell Texas Ranger knives since their introduction. The first three were all cut from the same cloth, as big and tough as the State they represented. These were larger than life knives made for larger than life users. They filled the hand, the blades were stout, they were men's knives and made no apologies about it.
Today my 2011 Texas Ranger Knife arrived and I am not sure what happened. Don't get me wrong, it is a nice knife, well made, same great fit and finish, a unique design with it's willow leave blade and sub hilt bolster...things not commonly found on a toothpick. But it leaves me feeling more Dallas suburbanite than Pecos Texas Ranger. The blade is the thinnest yet and lacks the big nail nick that allows for one hand opening om the others. It has fantastic walk and talk but the lack of blade weight doesn't allow it to thunk into the open position with the authoritative thunk of a Colt 45 hammer falling. It doesn't fill the hand, rather it feels almost...well..a bit effeminate.
And it doesn't have a lanyard hole.
I think if I didn't own and use the first three I would be perfectly happy with this knife. It embodies all the qualities I would expect a knife from A.G. Russell to have. Great design, great fit, plenty of snap, a stand alone style. If it wasn't the 2011 Texas Ranger Knife and I saw it in the catalog I probably would have bought one and been very happy with it.
The specs are...
closed... 5 1/8 inches
OAL... 9 1/4 inches
blade... 4 1/4 inches
spine 1/8 inch thick


Here you can see the nail nick compared to previous version. The older knives have a large deep nick that allows for one hand opening...also you can see the difference in blade thickness between previous models and the 2011...


It also comes with an excellent fitted sheath, much as the other did. The leather is heavy and sits the sheath high on the belt. The fit is near perfect.

Here is the complete family to date...

This knife is a fine knife, I will carry and use it but it just doesn't quite meet the legacy left by the first three. If the knife had only been 10% larger with the same heavy blade and nail nick used in previous models it would have fit in perfectly. Rather than being a brother to the other three I will have to consider this one to be their sister.
Today my 2011 Texas Ranger Knife arrived and I am not sure what happened. Don't get me wrong, it is a nice knife, well made, same great fit and finish, a unique design with it's willow leave blade and sub hilt bolster...things not commonly found on a toothpick. But it leaves me feeling more Dallas suburbanite than Pecos Texas Ranger. The blade is the thinnest yet and lacks the big nail nick that allows for one hand opening om the others. It has fantastic walk and talk but the lack of blade weight doesn't allow it to thunk into the open position with the authoritative thunk of a Colt 45 hammer falling. It doesn't fill the hand, rather it feels almost...well..a bit effeminate.
And it doesn't have a lanyard hole.
I think if I didn't own and use the first three I would be perfectly happy with this knife. It embodies all the qualities I would expect a knife from A.G. Russell to have. Great design, great fit, plenty of snap, a stand alone style. If it wasn't the 2011 Texas Ranger Knife and I saw it in the catalog I probably would have bought one and been very happy with it.
The specs are...
closed... 5 1/8 inches
OAL... 9 1/4 inches
blade... 4 1/4 inches
spine 1/8 inch thick


Here you can see the nail nick compared to previous version. The older knives have a large deep nick that allows for one hand opening...also you can see the difference in blade thickness between previous models and the 2011...


It also comes with an excellent fitted sheath, much as the other did. The leather is heavy and sits the sheath high on the belt. The fit is near perfect.

Here is the complete family to date...

This knife is a fine knife, I will carry and use it but it just doesn't quite meet the legacy left by the first three. If the knife had only been 10% larger with the same heavy blade and nail nick used in previous models it would have fit in perfectly. Rather than being a brother to the other three I will have to consider this one to be their sister.