Page 2 of 160
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:10 pm
by chetr1200c
jerry, you must have not read my entire post before. i found the box that the knife came in, and if what you say is true, then it is the wrong box and paperwork for that knife, because my knife is the very same as yours and tang stamp also. i know this isn't a 76 tang stamp.
but,,, what is interesting here is that the paperwork is for the 100 anniversary 72 and it clearly states that the they are jigged bone handles, not delrin, so there is another 72 for you to collect, since you seem to have only the delrin ones.
i will take some pics when i have the time and post them here for you to see and to read.
btw, looking at the scales on my knife thru a loupe they also look as if they are jigged bone and if they aren't bone, then they are a very good imitation.
i suppose this needs more investigating

here is the pic.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:19 pm
by jerryd6818
Chet -- Under magnification, can you see the vein pores along the edges of the handles and where the handles are hafted?
Man, this is becoming more of a conundrum than my weak mind is prepared to cope with.
Edit: Notice the certificate also says the blade is etched. It just doesn't say what's etched on it. Ducks for a centennial knife is kind of odd. You would think the etch would say 100 years or something about it being a centennial model.
Crazy.

Re: camillus #72
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:22 pm
by chetr1200c
jerryd6818 wrote:Chet -- Under magnification, can you see the vein pores along the edges of the handles and where the handles are hafted?
yes i can, and i also posted a pic in my previous tread. see what you can make of it

Re: camillus #72
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:31 pm
by jerryd6818
Well I just got off my lazy arse and drug mine out along with my cheap 45x Chinese microscope and you're right. It is bone.
Chet is right and I was wrong 9/24/12
And Carrmillus. Carrmillus was right and I was wrong.
This ain't the first time folks.

Re: camillus #72
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:57 pm
by chetr1200c
jerryd6818 wrote:Chet
Edit: Notice the certificate also says the blade is etched. It just doesn't say what's etched on it. Ducks for a centennial knife is kind of odd. You would think the etch would say 100 years or something about it being a centennial model.
Crazy.

that is why i don't think this is the proper box and paperwork for this knife. but it is the way i bought it back in 2008. i never gave it a second thought till now.
jerry i like your holloween bathrobe
do you have that box and paperwork with your anniversary? you can have these if you don,t.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:09 pm
by knifetime
jerryd6818 wrote:knifetime -- If those handles are bone it would make that the first 72 made with bone handles since sometime in the 1950s (maybe 1940s). SMKW doesn't usually go to any extra added expense. I'm just sayin'... it's difficult to tell the difference sometimes.
You sure are right about that Jerry.May be this will clear things up some.My knife is
#72B three blade knife, (Ole Smokey) , jigged brown bone handles.I cant wait to git the knife in hand.It came with the original box so may be it will give the info we need or at the very least some new info.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:43 pm
by jerryd6818
Dang, knifetime. It was bad enough it's an "Ole Smoky" but now it has bone handles too. Now I gotta have one.
Looking forward to pictures.
Edit: I've got to stop being so definite about my statements. "No bone handled Camillus 72s since the '50s". Fooey! What a dummy. Wrong twice in one day. Hope this doesn't get to be a habit.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:17 pm
by knifetime
LoL that's what I said win I saw it Jerry.This E-Mail is from the guy I got it from it may help.
Hello , Thank you for your order for the Camillus knife. Your package went out to you this AM and is scheduled to deliver on Thursday 9/27/12. This was a special for SMKW, but the pattern was in their regular line with delrin handles. I know you will enjoy it, Thanks again and please keep my store in your favorites.Ray
So it seems they were done in bone and derlon handles.That must be what the 72B is all about.That is how I take it Jerry.Hope we git some good info on it.
Don't fill bad Jerry it seems,from reading your other post, you're still right 99% of the time lol.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:41 pm
by jerryd6818
knifetime wrote:LoL that's what I said win I saw it Jerry.This E-Mail is from the guy I got it from it may help.
Hello , Thank you for your order for the Camillus knife. Your package went out to you this AM and is scheduled to deliver on Thursday 9/27/12. This was a special for SMKW, but the pattern was in their regular line with delrin handles. I know you will enjoy it, Thanks again and please keep my store in your favorites.Ray
So it seems they were done in bone and derlon handles.That must be what the 72B is all about.That is how I take it Jerry.Hope we git some good info on it.
Don't fill bad Jerry it seems,from reading your other post, you're still right 99% of the time lol.
Check your PMs.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:51 pm
by knifetime
PM sent Jerry.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:52 pm
by knifetime
I just got the Camillus 72B we had talked about in this post and all I can say is WoW what a nice knife.Bone handles and all mint.The knife, box and papers look like they did from the factory.It is my first 72 and I can sure see why you would want one.I have fond a new love the 72s.Now to find another lol.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 10:00 pm
by tjmurphy
Well Jerry, looks like their thinning the herd on ya!!

Re: camillus #72
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 10:58 pm
by jerryd6818
Oh sugar. Competition. Just what I need.
T.J. he lives over in your neck of the woods. Can you take care of a little business for me?
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 8:51 pm
by jerryd6818
Well, my competition didn't get this one.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 11:11 pm
by knifetime
jerryd6818 wrote:Well, my competition didn't get this one.
That is a nice one.
No comp hear guys that 72B was my 1st 72.After getting my hands on that one I sure would buy another if I git a chance.I would love to have one like you got there Jerryd that is a sweet one.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 2:21 am
by jerryd6818
Thank you. Dale (orvet) has one here on AAPK in his store.
http://www.allaboutpocketknives.com/kni ... 40607.html
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:31 pm
by knifetime
I got some pics of the 72B.They are not as good as the store pics but they are closer to the right color of the bone.I saw right of that the bone color and jigging where the same as on the Remington Bullet remakes I have that where made by Camillus.The muskrat looks darker but it is the same color.
I'm sold on the 72 thanks to you guys.I had never given them much thought until l read some of the post on AAPK and saw some nice pics of the 72.Thanks
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:56 pm
by tjmurphy
Jerry, I think you've created a monster............."HE'S ALIVE.........HE'S ALIVE".............
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:25 pm
by jerryd6818
By golly, you're right. It is the same jigging. Looks like the same bone & jigging as on the 100 year anniversary that has ducks engraved on the blade. I'm guessing all three were made around the same time.
T.J. -- Twasn't me Boss. Twas the knife what done it.
Shakin' it Boss.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:48 pm
by knifetime
jerryd6818 wrote:By golly, you're right. It is the same jigging. Looks like the same bone & jigging as on the 100 year anniversary that has ducks engraved on the blade. I'm guessing all three were made around the same time.
T.J. -- Twasn't me Boss. Twas the knife what done it.
Shakin' it Boss.
That is a nice one.
That is what I thought to,same bone.
I no the Remington is a 1988.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 10:22 pm
by jerryd6818
I'm just guessing but the Camillus was probably made right around the same time. That tang stamp is generally accepted as being first used in 1989 or so which begs the question, how could that knife be a 100 year Anniversary knife when the Camillus anniversary was 1976? I like cold hard facts and all that information just doesn't jive for me.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:52 pm
by knifetime
I found something that may help us.
This is from"History of Camillus"
In 1902 Kastor, purchased a small cutlery manufacturing firm in Camillus , N.Y. from Charles Sherwood. That was the beginning of Camillus Cutlery Company. Imported and U.S. made knives were under both Kastor and Camillus names.
So Kastor was in business in 1872 he did not buy Camillus till 1902 that would make the 100 year Anniversary 2002 and right about the same time your knives were made.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:05 pm
by jerryd6818
I understand your reasoning knifetime and you may be on to something. When Camillus released their 100th anniversary knives they put 1876-1976 on the COA's but the COA for this knife never really states it's an anniversary knife. Read it and let me know what you think. In my opinion, it's cleverly worded to be ambiguous.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:15 pm
by knifetime
Made a good sales pitch.You are right about that COA"ambiguous"was a good word for it.
I did E-Mail SMKW so maybe we can git some new info there.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:22 pm
by jerryd6818
It will be interesting to see what SMKW says.
BTW, on another chicken, a McGrew is up now on eBay, just in case you're interested.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/VINTAGE-McGREW- ... 51a209823c