Page 6 of 160
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:26 pm
by jerryd6818
More to come??
Crap!! "Killing me softly with his song."
If you treat a friend this way, I'd hate to be your enemy.

Re: camillus #72
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:32 pm
by jerryd6818
Okay, I put together a kind of History of 72s with pictures and posted it on my little web site. It's not gonna work that way because it came out to be 139 MB.
If you have high speed Internet service and are willing to wait it out or download it to your PC, here's the link. It's in .rtf Rich Text format.
Click Here
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:03 pm
by knifetime
Jerry I have some information that I have been trying to post but cant figure it out.How do I do like you did with this file?It is a PDF,"Adobe"
It is a list of "The Tang Stamps Of Adolph Kastor, Camillus and Their Cutlery Relatives"
Thanks for the info.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:23 am
by orvet
knifetime wrote:Jerry I have some information that I have been trying to post but cant figure it out.How do I do like you did with this file?It is a PDF,"Adobe"
It is a list of "The Tang Stamps Of Adolph Kastor, Camillus and Their Cutlery Relatives"
Thanks for the info.
Is that the info posted on Knife World's website?
The link is posted in the Camillus forum and a few other places on AAPK.
The format of AAPK does not allow the posting of .pdf files.
You would have to change to a .jpg file to post it on AAPK.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:43 am
by jerryd6818
Dale's correct that AAPK will only upload and display .jpg files using the "Upload Attachment" feature. BUT You can reference any Word Doc, PDF file, etc stored out on the Internet with the method I've used below. To see how I did it, reply to this post using the Quote button and you'll see the format of the command. In the meantime, here's your Kastor list.
To View The Kastor List -- Click Here
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:27 pm
by knifetime
That's the one I had Jerry,thanks.I think I might be able to git it now.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:10 pm
by orvet
In all my excitement of finding the 72 with the RARE acrylic Yello-Jaket shield, I forgot to post the one I got a day or two before.
Nothing real special, just a standard #72 Yellow-Jaket NIB, with papers.
I am starting to like these, though the ones with Rogers bone are still my favs!
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:35 pm
by jerryd6818
orvet wrote:I am starting to like these, though the ones with Rogers bone are still my favs!
For everyone.

Re: camillus #72
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:05 pm
by Shearer
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:28 am
by orvet
A bit of both I suppose...................................

Re: camillus #72
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:23 am
by Shearer
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:55 am
by ken6
Jerry, My camillus scout has that same shield, my Ulster Scouts all have the round shield. Ken
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:07 pm
by jerryd6818
Shearer -- No. Correct blade compliment but the incorrect frame profile and length. Nice old knife though. It wouldn't take much to clean it up and make a good user of it. (if the blades still have snap)
Ken -- I'm sorry, I don't know what shield you're talking about.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:37 am
by orvet
My first knife of the new year arrived yesterday.
It is a Stanley SL6, an SFO variant of the #72 Camillus made for Stanley Tools.
I like it!
It was still sealed in the clampak when it arrived, but I don't like to leave knives in a clampak, especially when all three blades are open. Too much stress on the springs, IMHO.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:31 am
by tjmurphy
Way to go Dale, I had one for a very short time and they are a very solid knife

Re: camillus #72
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:35 pm
by knifetime
I found that there is three of the #72 pattern made with the Remington tang stamp in 3 series Remington remakes by Camillus.All are done in 1996 and are great looking knives.Hear is one of the derlien ones.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:02 pm
by jerryd6818
Congratulations Dale. They're a real nice knife. Being made by Camillus, how could they not be?
T.J. -- I'm giving some serious consideration to putting the Lansky to that Stanley you gave me and slipping it in my pocket for a while. I've looked for a shield for it but no luck.
Okay boys & girls. Here's one that'll make ya go Huh??? If it goes relatively cheap, I'm thinking about picking it up just for the novelty of it.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:59 am
by tjmurphy
The shield is two stamps ahead of the stamp on the knife?
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 1:05 am
by danno50
The coping blade and the small clip are in opposite positions to what they usually are on the #72??
Dan
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 2:00 am
by tjmurphy
You're right Danno

Missed that

So that's two inconsistancies?
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 2:53 am
by jerryd6818
Both of you are correct. The blade has a '60-'76 tang stamp and the shield is '89 - close. The two secondary blades are swapped.
And
I believe those handles were called "Indian Stag" (synthetic) but to the best of my knowledge, they were never used on the 72. Other knives in the late '70s - early '80s but the 72 always had "Cabone" handles (jigged Delrin).
He wants $9.00 just to ship that thing.

I've changed my mind. I'm passing. I'm not wasting $30+ on that hermaphrodite.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:17 am
by tjmurphy
Ya reckon it was an end-of-business knife that someone just put together from remaining parts? Or a forgery?
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 5:40 am
by orvet
tjmurphy wrote:Ya reckon it was an end-of-business knife that someone just put together from remaining parts? Or a forgery?
I am not sure I would consider a knife made with proper parts to be a forgery, besides, where is the motivation to forge something? There is not enough money in it to buy the parts then pay someone to do all the work of putting it together.
It is kind of like counterfeiting a penny. It would cost you far more for the materials than the value of the coin.
In order to break even on parts and labor with that knife, you would need to sell it for $100 or more.
Therefore I would not consider it a counterfeit. It may be an end of days knife, put together with parts during the last days of the company, but I doubt it is a counterfeit, IMHO.
Re: camillus #72
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 10:16 am
by jerryd6818
Exact-O-Mundo. You took the words right out of my mouth Dale. Someone sure had a wild sense of humor. One thing for sure, it's one crazy piece of steel.