Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

The W.R. Case & Sons Cutlery Company has a very rich history that began in 1889 when William Russell (“W.R.”), Jean, John, and Andrew Case began fashioning their knives and selling them along a wagon trail in upstate New York. The company has produced countless treasures and it continues to do so as one of the most collected brands in the world.
Post Reply
User avatar
Lansky1
Posts: 1372
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 12:47 am
Location: "Pennsyltucky"
Contact:

Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by Lansky1 »

I've always gravitated to the medium frame stockman - somewhere around 3-1/2" long; in between the #44/90 & 47. That pretty much leaves the #32 or 18 in the Case world. I've found the 32 always seemed to ride in the pocket better than the 18. Here's why ...
wwww.JPG
wwww.JPG (18.56 KiB) Viewed 2594 times
IMG_7779.JPG
IMG_7777.jpg
The #32 is noticeably thinner ... just an interesting observation.
pffffft that's not a knife ......... now THAT'S a knife !! Crocodile Dundee

John
User avatar
XX Case XX
Posts: 3574
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:24 pm
Location: California

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by XX Case XX »

I've always liked the 32 pattern over the 18. The 18 is not bad, I just like the 32 for it's sleeker look and size. ::tu:: And I like the square bolsters. ::nod::

____________
Mike
Attachments
1970 6332.jpg
71 6332X3 (Mine).jpg
"If there are no Dogs in Heaven, then when I die, I want to go where they went". Will Rogers

I work hard so my Dog can have a better life...
User avatar
Steve Warden
Posts: 6320
Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 4:18 pm
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by Steve Warden »

Lansky1 wrote: The #32 is noticeably thinner ... just an interesting observation.
Optical illusion because the bolsters are pinched on the 32?
Take care and God bless,

Steve
TSgt USAF, Retired
1980-2000

But any knife is better than no knife! ~ Mumbleypeg (aka Ken)
User avatar
royal0014
Bronze Tier
Bronze Tier
Posts: 6305
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:21 pm
Location: ♥Sweet Home Alabama♥

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by royal0014 »

Huh ... and here I've been thinkin' the difference was only the
pen vs spay blade. Thanks for the visual comparison !

I've been eyeballing a 32, this cinches it . . . :)
Chris
i woke last night to the sound of thunder
how far off i sat and wondered
started humming a song from nineteen sixty two
aint it funny how the night moves
User avatar
Greenman
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:31 pm
Location: The Dark Side of the Moon

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by Greenman »

Steve Warden wrote:
Lansky1 wrote: The #32 is noticeably thinner ... just an interesting observation.
Optical illusion because the bolsters are pinched on the 32?
I believe Steve is correct; part of the perceived thickness difference is an optical illusion caused by the pinched bolsters on the 32. However, the centre liner on a modern 18 pattern is much thicker than that of a 32. Older 18s feel much slimmer in both the pocket and the hand due to their thinner centre liner and also because of more skilled hafting. I don’t know when the transition to the current design occurred; with the exception of two recent examples, all of my 18s are pre 1980.

Personally, I’ve always preferred round bolster stockmen such as Case’s 18s or 47s—they simply feel better in both my pocket and my hand. YMMV
Josh

/|\

“Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible god and destroys a visible nature, unaware that this nature he's destroying is this god he's worshipping.”
— Hubert Reeves
User avatar
Lansky1
Posts: 1372
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 12:47 am
Location: "Pennsyltucky"
Contact:

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by Lansky1 »

Steve Warden wrote:
Lansky1 wrote: The #32 is noticeably thinner ... just an interesting observation.
Optical illusion because the bolsters are pinched on the 32?
Actually the 32 in the pics above doesn't have pinched bolsters (oops, when I got home I checked - the bolsters are pinched on the 32's, so my bad ::facepalm:: ) . The pic isn't a distortion - the modern 18 is quite a bit thicker than a comparable modern era #32 (I don't have an older 18, so I can't say if they're thinner than the modern versions -would be interested to see a comparison if anyone has a 70's vs. modern #18).
pffffft that's not a knife ......... now THAT'S a knife !! Crocodile Dundee

John
kennedy knives
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 2187
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:37 pm
Location: westminster sc
Contact:

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by kennedy knives »

Here is a USA 6318 & a 2008 6318 Blue Jean Bone the USA liners are thinner , the bolsters are thinner all around thinner USA . Much better looking the older knives . The newer 6318 are just a little longer also . The first photo you can tell a big difference
Attachments
6318 001.JPG
6318 003.JPG
6318 007.JPG
User avatar
Lansky1
Posts: 1372
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 12:47 am
Location: "Pennsyltucky"
Contact:

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by Lansky1 »

Thanks so much for posting those pics - really get a sense of how the #18 has changed over the years ! Do you happen to know the year of the older one (just trying to get a feel for when the change occurred) ?
pffffft that's not a knife ......... now THAT'S a knife !! Crocodile Dundee

John
kennedy knives
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 2187
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:37 pm
Location: westminster sc
Contact:

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by kennedy knives »

Lansky1 wrote:Thanks so much for posting those pics - really get a sense of how the #18 has changed over the years ! Do you happen to know the year of the older one (just trying to get a feel for when the change occurred) ?
The Case XX USA 6318 was made between 1965 to 1969 .
kennedy knives
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 2187
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:37 pm
Location: westminster sc
Contact:

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by kennedy knives »

If you look at the back springs how they are even on the USA Model verse the 2008 model also at the tang area of blade the USA look more symmetrical than the 2008 . The Newer 2008 Stockman looks fatter not near as much fit & finish on it . I will try to find a current bone 6318 so we can have a better comparison Maybe someone can be me to the punch on that . ::tu::
User avatar
steve99f
Posts: 2769
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:49 pm
Location: Eastern PA

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by steve99f »

I've noticed the same thing regarding thickness at the bolsters on the copperhead jacks They got thicker in '79 or '80.
steve99f
kennedy knives
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 2187
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:37 pm
Location: westminster sc
Contact:

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by kennedy knives »

Couldn't find a new 6318 . So I thought that we would just compare a USA 6318 to a 1973- 6332 There is difference that you can see right off the 6318 measures 3 1/2" while the 6332 measures 3 5/8" . They look about alike in width . There is a difference in blades ,Both have a sheep foots the 32 has pen while the 18 has a spay blade the Clip on the 32 is more of a normal clip where the 18 looks like a California Clip . Still a lot better than the newer ones better looking Bone, fit & Finish &Thinner.
Attachments
6318 & 6332 007.JPG
6318 & 6332 011.JPG
6318 & 6332 006.JPG
6318 & 6332 004.JPG
User avatar
Lansky1
Posts: 1372
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 12:47 am
Location: "Pennsyltucky"
Contact:

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by Lansky1 »

Great stuff - I'm learning alot on this thread ! ::tu::
pffffft that's not a knife ......... now THAT'S a knife !! Crocodile Dundee

John
User avatar
AR Norby
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2011 5:03 am
Location: Arizona

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by AR Norby »

Old or new I still prefer the 6318
Perception is Reality
User avatar
Mumbleypeg
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 13409
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 1:28 am
Location: Republic of Texas

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by Mumbleypeg »

I also prefer the 18, primarily due to the rounded bolsters and serpentine shape. Just my preference.

Here's a comparison showing a 1971 versus a 2002 Case 3318 pattern. Both have green carried and used extensively by me (I "retired" the 1971 many years ago and replaced it with the 2002 version). As you can see the 2002 version (top knife in the picture) is thicker. While the trend recently seems to be people wanting "thinner" knives, IMHO the newer knife is a substantially sturdier knife.

Ken
Attachments
image.jpeg
image.jpeg (32.79 KiB) Viewed 2481 times
Member AKTI, TSRA, NRA.

If your religion requires that you hate someone, you need a new religion.

When the people fear their government, that is tyranny. When government fears the people, that is freedom.

https://www.akti.org/
knifeaholic
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 5124
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:41 am
Location: Central Massachusetts

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by knifeaholic »

The change to the bolsters started in the late 70's when Case stopped being as careful in the final hafting. so the bolsters started becoming somewhat blockier.

However, the big change occurred in 1985/86 when Case started stamping bolsters for all knives out of flat sheets of nickel silver. The traditional way prior to that point had been to die-form the bolsters out of square nickel silver bars, so the bolsters as formed were half-round to begin with. During final hafting of the knife, the handles were hafted to match the half-round bolster shape.

After 1985 with the bolsters stamped from flat stock, the only rounding that occurs happens during the final hafting, which seems to vary from pattern to pattern. You will see more rounding on the modern "pocket worn" knives.
Steve Pfeiffer, author of Collecting Case Knives: Identification and Price Guide published by Krause Publications.
User avatar
Lansky1
Posts: 1372
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 12:47 am
Location: "Pennsyltucky"
Contact:

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by Lansky1 »

Thanks Steve for that info - interesting how the methods of manufacturing bolsters at Case has changed. ::tu::
pffffft that's not a knife ......... now THAT'S a knife !! Crocodile Dundee

John
markpreston
Posts: 146
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2018 8:08 pm

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by markpreston »

Does the squared bolster knife have half stops,and if so do they feel better on opening than the 18?
User avatar
Lansky1
Posts: 1372
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 12:47 am
Location: "Pennsyltucky"
Contact:

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by Lansky1 »

markpreston wrote:Does the squared bolster knife have half stops,and if so do they feel better on opening than the 18?
I have about a dozen post 1980 32's (square bolsters) & none have half stops. I have read some of the 1970's 32's have half stops though...
pffffft that's not a knife ......... now THAT'S a knife !! Crocodile Dundee

John
32man
Posts: 32
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:59 pm

Re: Interesting medium stockman comparison (#18 vs. 32)

Post by 32man »

Thanks for that info Steve! I love my 32's! ::tu:: ::groove::
Post Reply

Return to “Case Knife Collector's Forum”